Robert J. Sawyer

A very nice article about the treatment of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence in my novels including Rollback and Factoring Humanity is online at Discovery News here.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

I’ll be Guest of Honor at Conjecture in San Diego from 1-3 October 2010. Come on out and see me! Conjecture is bing put on by the same group that’s hosting the 2011 World Fantasy Convention — so you know it’s going to be a good con! All the details are here.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Nick DiChario interviews Robert J. Sawyer in the August-September 2010 issue of Philosophy Now, a glossy newsstand magazine out of the UK. The interview is online here.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Over at Lightspeed magazine, Andrea Kail — herself a very fine SF writer — interviews me about the WWW trilogy, FlashForward, and my new project; it’s a nice, meaty piece. Check it out.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

The mass-market paperback of my novel WWW: Wake is currently #2 on the bestsellers’ list published in Locus, the US trade journal of the science-fiction field — and I just missed getting the #1 spot. A note accompanying the list says: “The Lost Fleet: Victorious by Jack Campbell just nudged ahead of WWW: Wake by Robert J. Sawyer in the paperback category.”

Meanwhile, the hardcover of WWW: Watch — the second volume of the trilogy — is currently at #7, in its second month on the list.

The full lists are here.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

In honor of a California judge overturning Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriages, I present the following scene from WWW:Watch, the second volume in my WWW trilogy (published by Ace in the US, Penguin in Canada, and Gollancz in the UK).

Shoshana Glick is a 27-year-old primatology grad student in San Diego. She works with a chimpanzee-bonobo hybrid named Hobo. Hobo is unique among apes in that he makes representational art — indeed, often portraits of Shoshana in profile.

Here’s an excerpt from Watch, which deals with Proposition 8 (and no, this isn’t all just tangential — it’s thematically important to the book). The first line of dialog below is spoken by Dillon, a male grad student, who works with Shoshana and Hobo.

“So, um, maybe this calls for a drink.”

Shoshana could see where this was going. “Well, I can ask Dr. Marcuse to pick up some champagne on his way back …” she replied, looking away.

“I mean,” Dillon said, and he paused, then tried again: “I mean maybe we should go out for a drink … you know, um, to celebrate.”

“Dillon …” she said softly.

He unfolded his arms and raised his right hand, palm out. “I mean, I know you sometimes go out with a guy named Max, but …”

“Dillon, I live with Max.”

“Oh.”

“And Max isn’t a guy; she’s a girl. Maxine.”

He looked relieved. “Ah, well, if she’s just your roommate, then …”

“Max is my girlfriend.”

“Your girl friend, or your, um, girlfriend?”

“My girlfriend; my lover.”

“Oh, um — ah, I didn’t … you never …”

Dillon had come to the Marcuse Institute in May; he’d missed the Christmas party, which, now that she thought about it, was the last time she’d brought Maxine around. “So,” said Shoshana, “thanks for the interest, but …”

Dillon smiled. “Can’t blame a guy for trying.”

“Thanks,” she said again. “You’re sweet.”

He crossed his arms again. “So, how long have you been with Maxine?”

“Couple of years. She’s an engineering student at UCSD.”

“Heh. Good that one of you is eventually going to make some money.”

Sho leaned back in her chair and laughed. Neither she nor Dillon was ever likely to get rich.

“And, ah, I take it it’s serious?” Dillon said tentatively.

She suppressed a grin; hope springs eternal. “Very much so. I’d marry Max, if I could.”

“Oh.”

“You know I’m from South Carolina, right?”

“I do declare!” he said, in a really bad Southern accent.

“But Max is from L.A. — South Central. Her family’s all there, and, well, it’s not like they can afford to travel to Boston or up to Canada. She wants to get married here in California, but …” She lifted her shoulders a bit.

“It used to be legal here, didn’t it?”

Sho nodded. “Got overturned the same day Obama was elected. A bittersweet night, I can tell you, for a lot of us. I was simultaneously elated and crushed.”

“I bet.”

“It should be legal here,” Shoshana said. “It should be legal everywhere.”

“I guess it’s against some people’s religions,” Dillon said.

“So what?” Sho snapped. But she put a hand to her mouth. “Oh, I’m sorry, Dillon. But I just get so tired of arguing this. If your beliefs tell you that you shouldn’t marry someone of the same sex, then you shouldn’t do it — but you shouldn’t have the right to impose your views on me.”

“Hey, Sho. Chill. I’m cool with it. But, um, there are those who say marriage is a sacrament.”

“There’s nothing sacred about marriage. You can go to city hall and get married without God once being mentioned. That issue was settled long ago.”

“I guess,” said Dillon.

But Sho had worked up a head of steam. “And gay people getting married doesn’t take anything away from anyone else’s marriage, any more than, say, the addition of Alaska and Hawaii made the people who were already Americans any less American. What we do doesn’t affect anyone else.”

Dillon nodded.

“And you’re a primatologist,” she said. “You know that homosexuality is perfectly natural. Homo sapiens practice it in all cultures, and bonobos practice it, too — which means the common ancestor probably practiced it, as well; it’s natural.”

“No doubt,” said Dillon. “But — playing devil’s advocate here — a lot of people who accept that it’s natural still don’t think that a union between two people of the same sex should be called a marriage. They’re leery of redefining words, you know, lest they lose their meaning.”

“But we have already redefined marriage in this country!” Sho said. “We’ve done it over and over again. If we hadn’t done that, black people couldn’t get married — they weren’t allowed to when they were slaves. And as recently as 1967, there were still sixteen states in which it was illegal for a white person to marry a black person. Max is black, by the way, and if we hadn’t redefined marriage, I couldn’t marry her even if she were a guy. We also long ago gave up the traditional definition of marriage as being `until death do us part.’ Nobody says you have to stay in a bad marriage anymore; if you want out, you can get divorced. The definition of marriage has been a work-in-progress for centuries.”

“Okay, okay,” said Dillon. “But …”

“What?”

“Oh, nothing …”

She tried to make her tone light. “Sorry. I didn’t mean to take your head off. What is it?”

“Well, if they do repeal the ban here, so you and Maxine can get married, um, how does that work? Do you, you know, have two maids of honor …?”

“People do it different ways. But I’ve already decided I’m going to have a best man.”

“Oh? Anybody I know?”

“Yep.” She glanced at the monitors that showed the feeds from the cameras on the island. “Oh, and look — he’s painting another picture!”

An excerpt from Watch by Robert J. Sawyer

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • newsgroup • Email

I’m thrilled to be making my third trip to Japan! I’ll be Guest of Honor at HAL-Con 2011 in Tokyo, April 9-10, 2011. Woohoo!

My other upcoming appearances are listed here.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

When I was twelve, I was blind for six days.

I live in Toronto. Back then we got a lot of snow in winter, and kids had a blast making snowballs. But, as the saying goes, it’s all fun and games until some loses an eye — and I came darn close. A snowball hit me smack in the eye, causing a severe hyphema. I had to lie flat on my back for six days with patches over both eyes, in hopes that the damage would heal.

And it did: I’ve long since forgotten which eye was injured, and my current ophthalmologist can’t tell which one it was. But, still, that period of blindness has stuck with me: ever since those six days, I’ve been fascinated by the notion of sensory deprivation. I knew I was going to get my sight back when the patches came off (even in the worst case, I’d still have sight in one eye). But what, I wondered, would it be like to have always been blind? What view — and I used that term advisedly — of the world would one have if one couldn’t see?

And that, in many ways, was the seed from which my novel Wake grew. The main human character is Caitlin Decter, a 15-year-old math genius who has been totally blind since birth.

But there’s another character in Wake who can’t see, either: a nascent consciousness that’s emerged in the background infrastructure of the World Wide Web. It thinks — and maybe even feels — but cannot perceive. It is utterly alone and isolated.

Before my teacher came to me, I did not know that I am. I lived in a world that was a no-world. I cannot hope to describe adequately that unconscious, yet conscious time of nothingness. I had neither will nor intellect. My inner life, then, was a blank without past, present, or future, without hope or anticipation, without wonder or joy or faith.

I wish I could take credit for that poetically beautiful bit of writing, but I can’t. The author is Helen Keller, in her 1904 book The World I Live In. She was blind and deaf from her 18th month, and had descended into an abyss. The teacher she alludes to was Annie Sullivan, a young woman who herself had spent much of her life almost blind. Annie reached down into that abyss and brought Helen out, uplifting her.

And perhaps Caitlin Decter — who understands in a way very few others possibly can what it’s like to live without light — can uplift the nascent consciousness she’s stumbled upon, too.

Of course, I drew on my own boyhood taste of blindness in writing Caitlin, and also on my experience of having had a blind grandfather. But, in a fitting move given that I was writing about the World Wide Web, I also received enormous help online from members of the BlindMath mailing list — a group for visually impaired people who do the kind of sophisticated math my Caitlin revels in. Five members of the list read the entire book in manuscript (using refreshable Braille displays to work from an electronic file), and their input was invaluable.

Caitlin has a fascinating journey in Wake, and so does the consciousness she’s discovered. But that book is just the beginning: their story continues in Watch and concludes in Wonder, making this — yes — the WWW trilogy. Although these are my 18th, 19th, and 20th novels, they’ve proven to be the most difficult — and most rewarding — ones I’ve ever written. I hope you enjoy them.

Robert J. Sawyer is one of only seven writers in history to win all three of the world’s top awards for best science fiction novel of the year: the Hugo, the Nebula, and the John W. Campbell Memorial Award. His physical home is just outside Toronto; in webspace, it’s sfwriter.com.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Check out this awesome book trailer for my novel Watch — it’s like a mini-movie, with a full cast. Way, way cool! (Also available on YouTube.)

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

In April 2009, I was asked by Cosmos, Australia’s leading science magazine, to contribute to their “Bookmark” column. Normally, that column has scientists recommending books; for the first time ever, they asked a science-fiction writer to do it instead. My suggestions appeared in issue 27:

Robert J. Sawyer is a Hugo and Nebula Award-winning science-fiction writer in Toronto. His latest novel Wake is the first of a trilogy about the World Wide Web gaining consciousness; his website is sfwriter.com.

The book I’m reading right now:

Rapture for the Geeks: When AI Outsmarts IQ by Richard Dooling (2008)

A glib take on Vernor Vinge’s concept of the Singularity — the end of the human era when machines become more intelligent than us. Given that Dooling heavily mines science fiction for his ideas, he takes a few too many cheap shots at the genre, but he does provide a good overview of the issues.

My most influential books: Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared Diamond (1985)

A masterpiece that explains more about the inequalities in our world than any dozen other books; a brilliant tour of topics ranging from the origins of language to the domestication of animals. Diamond manages to be simultaneously both humbling and uplifting.

Gateway by Frederik Pohl (1978)

For my money the best science-fiction novel ever written, because it pays wonderful respect to both halves of the term, dealing with the weird physical phenomena that occur near a black hole — and spinning a very human story of guilt that arises from them.

Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness by Roger Penrose (1996)

Mathematical physicist Penrose is probably wrong that microtubules in the cytoskeletons of brain tissue are the seat of consciousness, but that doesn’t matter: his book is an amazing tour de force of ideas, and is far more emotionally and intellectually satisfying than other books that attempt to dismiss consciousness as meaningless or an illusion.

The book I want to read next:

Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins by Donald C. Johanson and Kate Wong (2009)

As a science-fiction writer, my job is thinking about where we’re going, but the only way to effectively extrapolate forward is by knowing where we came from. Johanson discovered the australopithecine Lucy in 1974, and 35 years on he tackles the vexing questions that still ignite passionate debate among paleoanthropologists.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

An op-ed piece by Robert J. Sawyer first published in The Ottawa Citizen, the largest-circulation newspaper in Canada’s capital city (first published under the headline “The Future Disappoints”).

Science: Ten Lost Years

by Robert J. Sawyer

Ten years ago, in 1999, I published a novel called FlashForward; ten years later, it’s a (cough, cough) hit TV series for ABC.

Ten years ago, I set that novel’s opening at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN with my characters undertaking an experiment to find the Higgs boson — the particle believed to endow other particles with mass. Ten years later, after a comic series of delays, that experiment is finally running in reality.

If only all my other sunny predictions about science and technology from a decade ago had come true! Back at the end of the 1990s, all of us who trade in futures were being interviewed about what we thought the next decade would hold. My colleagues and I blithely spoke about the promise of nanotechnology, the miracles of stem-cell research, the revitalization of the manned-space program.

And now the decade we described is coming to an end, and, well, the same pundits are making the same predictions for the next decade. What went wrong?

An easy, and not untrue, answer is to say: George W. Bush. After all, it was his administration that put the skids on embryonic stem-cell research; it was he who called for humanity to go to Mars but earmarked no money for the venture; and it was he who embarked on a pointless war that beggared the federal coffers, leaving little for fundamental research.

(I’m hardly the first to make such observations, and I commend to your attention the book The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney.)

But it would be facile to just blame governments — including our own, which has certainly not been as friendly as it should have been to pure science.

Thank goodness that BlackBerry co-inventor Mike Lazaridis stepped up to the plate and provided the initial private financing — not to mention a couple of major booster shots along the way — to fund the world-class Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, which just celebrated its tenth anniversary. It’s the kind of project our tax dollars should have paid for on their own.

Also, to put it all down to politicians would be to ignore a harsh reality of the past decade: the promise of science has, too often, been derailed by the scientists themselves.

Why is stem-cell research faltering? In part because greedy scientists falsified data and used unethical techniques in gaining embryonic tissue. Most famously, in 2006, South Korean stem-cell researcher Hwang Woo-suk was indicted for fraud, embezzlement, and violations of his country’s bioethics laws, after announcing bogus breakthroughs.

And if that wasn’t bad enough, the single most important scientific issue of the decade — whether climate change is human-caused — was dealt a huge blow in November. E-mails leaked from Britain’s Climate Research Unit showed that scientists there apparently cooked the books to prove that humans are at fault for climate change.

Sadly, the two cases are crucially similar: stem-cell research really does hold the key to curing diseases, regenerating organs, and prolonging life. And, I’m convinced, human activity has contributed hugely to changes in our weather. But in a world in which it’s mainstream to claim that the moon landings were a hoax, that 9/11 was an inside job, and that evolution is “only a theory,” this sort of irresponsible activity undermines public faith in science, and lets the politicians tighten the purse strings with impunity.

Lazaridis’s largess is, in fact, more typical than not of the nature of science and technology advancement in the last decade. It’s those in the private sector who gave us the BlackBerry and the iPhone, Google (and Google Earth and Google Maps and Google Books), Facebook and Twitter, electronic-ink devices like the Amazon Kindle and the Sony Reader, tiny and cheap netbook computers, and more.

Of course, there’s fundamental science behind all those things. But for a decade now, most of the best US grads in math and computer science either went to work for the National Security Agency, where they labour on classified projects, or to private-sector firms such as Google, Microsoft, or Electronic Arts, where everything they do is covered by nondisclosure agreements. God knows what they came up with in the last decade; it’ll never be published in journals.

We’ve ended up with a broken system in which the best science is hidden away, and even the top journals are suspect (Hwang Woo-suk’s fabrications appeared in Science, the world’s leading scientific journal).

Still, as in everything, the most powerful force is the economy. Ten years ago, the economy was bright, and those of us who dream for a living could suggest that enormous strides would be made. Ten years later, the economy is in tatters, and hundred-billion-dollar space voyages and new supercolliders are off the agenda.

Did the aughts, the zeros, or whatever term we end up using for this now-completed decade, live up to my hopes for scientific advancement? No. Will the next decade? Perhaps — but if we want it to, we should take two lessons from the ten years that just ended.

First, we have to let our governments know that science is important to us. Second, we have to let our scientists know that absolute honesty is the only acceptable course.

Whether either faction will get these messages, only time will tell. Let’s compare notes again at the end of 2019.

Robert J. Sawyer’s Nebula Award-winning science-fiction novel The Terminal Experiment has just been reissued by Penguin Canada.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Eleven months ago, at the beginning of August 2009, I did a by-email interview with a reporter for a genre magazine who was doing an article about FlashForward, the ABC TV series based on my novel of the same name. Only brief snippets were used int he article, and while cleaning my hard drive today I stumbled across the original by-email interview, which has some good stuff in it, and so I’m posting it here. Enjoy.

How did the idea for the novel come about?

In 1995, my wife and I hosted a 20th-anniversary reunion party for our high-school science fiction club, which is where we met. And all evening long, people kept saying, “If I only knew then what I know now, things would have turned out better.” Some were lamenting bad marriages; others, bad career choices; others still, bad investments. Well, I got to wondering if that was really true: if certain foreknowledge of the future would indeed make one happier. And so I contrived a science-fictional thought experiment: an accident that causes the consciousness of everyone on Earth to jump twenty years into the future for a period of two minutes. Of course, shunting consciousness forward meant everyone blacked out in the here and now — millions of people die in car accidents, as planes crash, falling down stairs, and so on. My tidy little notion turned out also to be a great springboard for a disaster novel.

How did the series idea develop?

My Hollywood agent, Vince Gerardis, read an early draft of the book in 1998, back when I was calling it Mosaic — a term that figures prominently in the novel, as well as in the TV series. He loved it, and got it into the hands of his old friend Jessika Borsiczky, a very fine producer who happens to be married to David S. Goyer; David, of course, went on to write Batman Begins. David and Jess both loved the book, but weren’t in a position to do anything with it at that time. Still, Vince was convinced that David and Jessika were the right people to develop the project, and so he talked me into turning down a very sizable deal from a Hollywood studio while we waited for them to have time to work on it.

In 2005, David ended up working with Brannon Braga on the science-fiction TV series Threshold, and they were talking one day, and David mentioned that he was keen on this novel now called FlashForward by Robert J. Sawyer. Well, Brannon replied that he, too, was a fan of my work and they hit on the idea of collaborating on a script adapting my novel.

In 2007, I went down to Los Angeles and met with David, Jessika, and Brannon, and they outlined for me how they were planning to adapt my novel; they seemed genuinely concerned that I be happy with what they had in mind — and I was, and am; they had a very clever take on the material.

Brannon and David wrote the one-hour pilot script, entitled “No More Good Days.” That script immediately sold to HBO, but as Dave and Brannon mapped out what they intended for the project, it soon became clear that the show could run a hundred episodes or more; it was simply too big an idea to do under the handful-of-episodes-per-season model that HBO specializes in. And so, with HBO’s blessing, the property was offered to the big-four US broadcast networks, and ABC and Fox got in a bidding war for it, with ABC ultimately prevailing. HBO still retains a financial position in the series and ABC Studios is producing. Brannon Braga is tied up with his duties for 24 at Fox, but is still serving as an Executive Producer on FlashForward; meanwhile, Marc Guggenheim has come on board to join David as the showrunners.

My deal has me serving as creative consultant, and writing one of the first-season episodes myself.

After the development of the concept, was there a challenge to developing the story(ies) itself?

Yes, certainly. If you were to film every scene in a typical novel — including FlashForward — you might end up with 10 hours of film. Normally, adaptation is a paring down, a stripping away. We’re hoping to run for many seasons, maybe five — and that would be a hundred and ten hours of programming. And so it’s been a process of expanding the vision of novel, finding little bits of business from the book that can be elaborated, and adding whole new dimensions, as well. Each new “day” in the novel FlashForward begins with a “News Digest” — summaries of world reaction to the events, such as, “A massive sell-off of Japanese yen has precipitated yet another crisis in the Japanese economy, following indications from the Flashforward that the yen will be worth only half its current value against the U.S. dollar in the future.” Obviously, any one of those could suggest an episode.

What’s entailed in your role as consultant with the series?

Just that: to consult. At San Diego Comic-Con this year, David Goyer referred to me as the series’ “unofficial science consultant,” and certainly a lot of the conversations David and I have had have been about scientific issues — about keeping it all plausible. But we’ve also talked about long-term issues, how the series will develop season to season, and so on.

Whenever literature is brought to TV or film, there are adjustments that have to be made for the medium. Were there alterations to the story?

Yes, of course, and to find out what they were, you’ll have to watch the show. ABC is very concerned about spoilers, and about keeping surprises intact for people. If something’s the same as it is in my novel, that should be a surprise; if it’s different, that should be a surprise, too. None of us are providing information about how the adaption is being made, but I will say this: I’m thrilled by how many people involved have read the novel. Obviously, David Goyer, Brannon Braga, Jessika Goyer, and Marc Guggenheim — the executive producers — but also many of the actors (who, after all have no obligation to read anything but the scripts), including Joseph Fiennes, Sonya Walger, and Zachary Knighton, special-effects supervisor (and Cloverfield genius) Kevin Blank, and even the whole team of guys at Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, who are dubbing the show into other languages.

The script you’re working on … Has it been slotted into the series’ schedule? How far along is it?

It will be in the backorder: the final block of nine episodes to round out the first season, assuming we get renewed after our initial 13. David Goyer have had some conversations about where my script will fit in — we immediately both gravitated toward me working on the same sort of story — and I’m very excited.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Happy 15th anniversary to my website –
it’s older than Amazon.com, was the first science-fiction author site on the web, has been giving away fiction since the first week, and has over 1,000,000 words of content. Check it out at sfwriter.com.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

I was the only author invited to give a solo talk at this year’s Canadian Book Summit, which had the theme of “Hot New Models” — the implicit assumption being that new technologies and ways of doing business, such as ebooks and print-on-demand, were going to be the salvation of traditional publishing.

My talk was widely regarded as the most controversial of the day: I started by recounting how, a few months ago, I’d had fellow science-fiction writers Robert Charles Wilson and James Alan Gardner over for pizza; at that dinner, I’d told Bob and Jim that I feared there was only a decade left in which anyone could make a comfortable living writing science-fiction novels, and urged them to plan their careers and finances accordingly.

My talk at the Canadian Book Summit was given only a week ago, but in the interim I’ve had much cause to reflect on one of the core conceits behind the notion of “hot new models,” namely that authors will find some way other than royalties from books actually sold to make their livings, and that these opportunities will abound.

(At the conference, many people cited the band model now prevalent for successful acts in the music industry: give away your music and make money off of live performances and T-shirts. I debunked that at the event by pointing out that the venue we happened to be in — Harbourfront Centre in Toronto — is home to the the International Festival of Authors, the world’s best, most-prestigious literary festival, a festival which, if you’re lucky, you get invited to every four or five years, and that this top-of-the-line opportunity to perform in front of an audience pays around $300, and might, with real luck, sell 50 hardcovers, of which the author’s share of royalties might be another $150.)

So, in this last week, what hot new opportunities have come my way? Let’s see:

• A public library patron in Atlantic Canada wrote to me, lamenting that she’d already read the few books of mine her library had, and asking me to donate copies of all the others to the library, since, you know, with budget cuts, libraries can’t afford to buy many books themselves anymore.

• A request that I give the “keynote address” — for free — at a convention consisting entirely of used-book dealers; of course, I make no money when a used book changes hands, which would have meant that I’d be the only one at the convention making nothing.

• A request that I be guest of honor at a science-fiction convention, which was offering to pay “a portion” of my travel expenses to get there. In the good old days, sf conventions paid all the travel expenses for the guest-of-honor author and his or her companion. The last couple of years, the offer to cover the companion’s airfare has often disappeared. And now, even covering all the author’s airfare seems to be an open question. (Oh, yes, a few dozen copies of my latest paperback might sell in the convention’s dealers’ room, netting me maybe $25 in royalties, but there was no way I’d even break even over the short term by accepting.)

Other offers that have crossed my desk in the last few months include me teaching writing at an austere retreat for $3,000 — for ten full days, on-site (I make more than $300 a day normally, so this would be me subsidizing the cost of the event so that students could pay less); me speaking at a conference that’s charging $900 per attendee to get into, and I’d get no fee and have to pay my own expenses to travel to New York City for the event; an anthology contract that paid nothing at all for the story, but would let one buy copies at 50% off cover price; and so on.

Maybe there will be new ways to make money as a novelist. Certainly, I do make a lot of money each year from giving keynote addresses, and, of course, I was very lucky that ABC made FlashForward, a prime-time TV series based on my novel of the same name.

But for the former, really, I’m exceptional; most novelists are not good at public speaking, and few can spin what they write into something businesses and government agencies will pay thousands to hear you speak about.

And for the latter, that’s the sort of thing that almost never happens to anyone: rounded to the nearest percent, zero percent of members of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America have ever had a major-network prime-time TV series made from their work.

(And, my, but my mother raised me well: she always says, “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.” I just smiled each time someone told me how much they liked the FlashForward TV series, and how happy they were with themselves for finding some way to watch it that didn’t cost them anything and avoided having to see those pesky commercials. And now, of course, the series is gone.)

So, what does the future hold? It’ll be interesting to find out — but those who believe it’ll just all sort itself out in the end are, I think, being naive and self-deluding. Yes, as one person said repeatedly at the Canadian Book Summit, there have always been storytellers — but that doesn’t mean you can do it for a living.

Even David G. Hartwell — senior editor at Tor Books — recently wrote in an editorial in the New York Review of Science Fiction that we could all still be happy when the day of the full-time SF writer has passed. (I actually think the day of the full-time SF editor may pass first, but that’s another matter.)

Maybe we will all indeed still be smiling as writing sf shifts from a career to a hobby. Still, lengthy, ambitious, complex works — works that take years of full-time effort to produce such as, say, Kim Stanley Robinson’s Mars trilogy, or, if I may be so bold, my own WWW trilogy of Wake, Watch, and Wonder — aren’t things that could have been produced in any kind of reasonable time by squeezing in an hour’s writing each day over one’s lunch break while working a nine-to-five job.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

I’m lovin’ my associating with Audible.com and Brilliance Audio. The former offers a bunch of my novels as audiobooks for download; the latter offers some of the same productions on traditional audio CD and also on MP3 CD.

I just got copies of the 12-disc CD version of WWW: Wake and WWW: Watch, and each sports snazzy art, plus exclusive introductions by me. These are multivoice productions, starring Jessica Almasy, Jennifer Van Dyck, A.C. Fellner, and Marc Vietor, and they’re absolutely terrific. You can get the Brilliance Audio CD versions at major retailers or online (Wake is here and Watch is here), and all of my Audible.com material here. All the audiobooks are unabridged.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

WWW: Wake by Robert J. Sawyer is a finalist for the John W. Campbell Memorial Award — the principal juried award in the science-fiction field (and not to be confused with the other John W. Campbell Award — the one for best new writer).

(Wake is also a current Hugo Award finalist and recently won Canada’s Aurora Award.)

This is a particularly good year for Canadians and the Campbell Memorial, with four of us on the shortlist: Atwood, Doctorow, Sawyer, and Wilson (and all but Atwood are previous winners).

The full list of nominees:

• Margaret Atwood, The Year of the Flood (Nan A. Talese)
  
• Paolo Bacigalupi, The Windup Girl (Night Shade Books)
  
• Iain M. Banks, Transition (Orbit)
  
• Cory Doctorow, Makers (Tor)
  
• Nancy Kress, Steal Across the Sky (Tor)
  
• Paul McAuley, Gardens of the Sun (Gollancz)
  
• China Mieville, The City & the City (Del Rey)
  
• Adam Roberts, Yellow Blue Tibia (Gollancz)
  
• Kim Stanley Robinson, Galileo’s Dream (Spectra)
  
• Robert J. Sawyer, WWW: Wake (Ace / Penguin Canada / Gollancz)
  
• Bruce Sterling, The Caryatids (Del Rey)
  
• Robert Charles Wilson, Julian Comstock: A Story of 22nd-Century America (Tor)

My nominations to date were for Calculating God (2001); Hominids (2003); Mindscan (2006); Rollback (2008); and now Wake (2010).

The current Campbell jury consists of Gregory Benford, Paul Di Filippo, Sheila Finch, James Gunn, Elizabeth Anne Hull, Paul Kincaid, Christopher McKitterick, Pamela Sargent, and T.A. Shippey.

Pictured below: my Campbell Memorial Award trophy for Mindscan.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

I was asked at the Canadian Book Summit yesterday if I could change one thing about what my publishers do, what would that be? A better answer than the one I gave has occurred to me: Give the author more free copies to distribute for promotional purposes. (Believe it or not, boilerplate contracts from most publishers specify that authors get just ten copies of their own books.)

Yes, I know I can ask my publisher to send out a review copy, and hope they actually do it, but in addition please give us a couple of dozen copies to spread around as we see fit.

I first made the major Canadian bestsellers lists (The Globe and Mail and Maclean’s) a decade ago, back in 2000, because Carolyn ran into Toronto Star religion editor Tom Harpur at a conference and had the presence of mind to hand him a copy of my book Calculating God then and there from my personal stock. The Star is the largest-circulation newspaper in Canada, and Harpur’s subsequent article about the book without question is what boosted my novel onto the best-sellers list.

Trust your authors to effectively distribute the extra copies to their influential contacts or even to long-shots that might pan out. An extra 24 hardcover, at manufacturing cost, even with shipping, will cost the publisher maybe $100; how can it not be cost-effective to do this?

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

The latest issue of The Journal of Consciousness Studies (Vol. 17, No. 5-6) lists “Notable Quotes” from this year’s Toward a Science of Consciousness conference in Tucson, including these from my keynote address:

“Canada should have British culture, French cuisine, and American know-how. Instead, Canada has British cuisine, American culture, and French know-how.”

“Scholars ask me if I do any research before I write my science-fiction books. I ask them if they do research before they write papers or do they pull them out of their asses?”

“You can argue with me: write your own damn book and argue!”

“Editing audio tape with a razor blade ranks just above philosophy in terms of marketable skills.”

“Science fiction: Bush or Gore win in 2000; fantasy: Nader wins.”

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Jim Moret, chief correspondent for the TV news magazine Inside Edition, recently posted his review of my novel FlashForward on his Facebook page:

I became hooked on the ABC series Flash Forward which, sadly, has not been renewed. Today I bought and read the novel that inspired the show. This is a great read – it is provocative on a philosophical level as well as being an excellent mystery, not so much science fiction as speculative fiction. It makes you think long after you have finished the last page (for me the book was a one sitting read because I needed to see how it ended) Better still, I wrote to the author, Robert J Sawyer, and he graciously wrote me back the same day! When does that happen? Anyway – I recommend this book. Enjoy.

How cool is that? Since Jim anchored CNN’s coverage of the O.J. Simpson trial in 1995, I’m sending him a copy of the beautiful new Penguin Canada edition of Illegal Alien, my novel inspired by that trial (in which “the trial of the Centauri” rivals “the trial of the century”).

Jim has a new book of his own out, an inspirational memoir entitled The Last Day of My Life, published by Phoenix Books.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Here’s a first look at the cover for Wonder, concluding volume of my WWW trilogy, coming in early April 2011 from Ace in the US, Penguin in Canada, and Gollancz in the UK. Click the image for a larger version, and click again if your browser is still scaling it down.

The covers for all three volumes of the trilogy are by the amazing Rita Frangie.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

On Sunday, May 23, 2010, the 30th anniversary Aurora Awards banquet was held in Winnipeg at Keycon, this year’s Canadian National Science Fiction Convention. Fan Organizational nominee Kirstin Morrell used Robert J. Sawyer’s Twitter feed to tweet the proceedings live as they happened. Below is what she had to say; above is a photo of Rob with his Best Novel Aurora trophy (photo by fellow best-novel nominee Barbara Galler-Smith):

• At Prix Aurora Award banquet in Winnipeg. Kirstin Morrell is going to use my account to tweet the results in real-time. Take it away, Kirst!
• Liana Kerzner is master of ceremonies in amazing black dress.
• First-ever year having nominee pins for the Aurora Awards (a la the Hugo pins). Courtesy of the 1994 Winnipeg Worldcon, ConAdian.
• Virgie says hi! (Rob notes she’s wearing an oh-my-effing-god hawt red dress!)
• At our table: nominees galore: Hayden Trenholm, Dan O’Driscoll, Karl Johanson, Robert J. Sawyer, Kirstin Morrell.
• Liz Westbrook-Trenholm just toasted the Magnificent Basterds (the best-novel nominees).
• Now Rob is toasting the Magnificent Basterds, and the other nominees.
• I must say, everyone looks lovely this evening. :D
• Food service took a lot longer than expected. Awards haven’t started yet. Soon.
• Virgie and Karl are throwing paper airplanes.
• There are 11 trophies on the platform, but only 10 categories. Tie? Co-authored winner? We’ll see!
• Kirstin is combing hair.
• It’s very hot in the banquet room.
• LeAmber Raven is mounting the podium.
• Virgie just said, “Hot diggity!”
• Hayden Trenholm — who works for a senator — is regaling us with stories about doing it in a bar.
• Um, before I get myself in more trouble, Liz wants to weigh in: Serving drinks, we all mean.
• Liana K is going up to the podium. Can’t wait!
• It’s begun!
• Liana’s giving a great speech about the symbiosis between writing nominees and fan org/other noms. Excellent speech.
• Jean-Louis Trudel giving an introductory speech en francais.
• “Merci beaucoup.” JLT is off the stage.
• Winner of Fanzine at the Auroras: Richard Greaeme Cameron for WCFSAZine.
• Best Artist: Dan O’Driscoll — he’s here, and thrilled.
• Virginia O’Dine in tears to see her artist win.
• Dan’s girlfriend Theresa is pumped.
• French Other: Solaris, Joel Champetier. JLT accepting for Joel.
• (Presented by Walling and Bourget)
• Next up: Hayden presenting for English other.
• Women of the Apocalypse wins!
• 3 of 4 authors here.
• Ryan McFadden accepting.
• Billy Milholland and Eileen Bell also thanking.
• Fan organizational: David Hayman, Filk Hall of Fame (not present).
• Congrats to all the winners so far.
• (Fan Organizational presented by Rob Sawyer.)
• Winnipeg librarian presenting award now to English short story.
• Nominees being read, applause for each.
• Winner is Ponds Dreaming of Roses by Eileen Bell from Women of Apocalypse.
• Thanking Rob Sawyer, Brian Hades, her husband, the rest of the Apocalyptic Four.
• Liana just said that, at the Auroras, everyone thanks Rob Sawyer. :) It’s true!
• LRM (Linda Ross Mansfield) presenting.
• Short french presented by Linda Ross-Mansfield to Alain Bergeron for Ors blancs.
• Rene Walling accepting for Alain.
• Fan other presented by Diane Lacey (CUFF delegate) to: Ray Badgerow, USS Hudson Bay astronomy lecture.
• Nalo Hopkinson presenting French novel to …
• Laurent McAllister! Supernaturatie. JLT accepting for him and Yves Meynard (it’s their pen name) — le woot!
• And now best novel in English:
• Now Long Form in English nominees!!!
• Presenting is Julie Czerneda . . .
• Holy moley, Rob WON!!! For WAKE!!! Well deserved!
• Rob hasn’t won for many, many years, and I think it’s so beyond due. Congratulations, Rob. :D
• Ten years since Sawyer won for novel; last was #FlashForward — as he said, that turned out pretty well. ;)
• Rob thanked editors Stanley Schmidt at ANALOG, Barbara Berson at Penguin Canada, Ginjer Buchanan at Ace, and Simon Spanton at Orion.
• Woohoo!
• And that’s it!
• And Kirstin’s signing off. :)

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

The winners of the 2010 Prix Aurora Awards were announced over Victoria Day weekend at a gala banquet in Winnipeg concluding Keycon, this year’s Canadian National Science Fiction Convention. Liana Kerzer was mistress of ceremonies. The winners are:

• Best Novel in English: Wake by Robert J. Sawyer (published by Penguin Canada)
• Meilleur Roman en Français (Best Novel in French): Suprématie by Laurent McAllister (pen name for Jean-Louis Trudel and Yves Meynard) (published by Bragelonne)
• Best Short-Form Work in English: “Pawns Dreaming of Roses” by Eileen Bell (from Women of the Apocalypse)
• Meilleure Nouvelle en Français (Best Short-Form Work in French): «Ors blancs» by Alain Bergeron (from Solaris 117)
• Best Work in English (Other): Women of the Apocalypse by the Apocalyptic Four (Eileen Bell, Roxanne Felix, Billie Milholland, and Ryan McFadden) (published by Absolute Xpress)
• Meilleur Ouvrage en Français (Autre) / (Best Work In French (Other): Revue. Joël Champetier, éditeur
• Artistic Achievement: Dan O’Driscoll, cover of Steel Whispers (published by Bundoran Press)
• Fan Accomplishment (Fanzine): WCFSAZine, edited by R. Graeme Cameron
• Fan Accomplishment (Organization): David Hayman, organization Filk Hall of Fame
• Fan Accomplishment (Other): Ray Badgerow, astronomy lecture at USS Hudson Bay

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

At 22 episodes, FlashForward is now the longest-running science-fiction series ever based on a novel by a member of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America; the previous record-holder was 1970’s The Immortal (15 hour-long episodes plus 90-minute pilot film), based on James Gunn’s novel The Immortals, also on ABC.

I’m very proud of the series, and am thrilled that our pilot episode, “No More Good Days,” is a current Hugo Award finalist. I had a blast working as Consultant on the show, enjoyed writing the 19th episode (“Course Correction”), was treated wonderfully every time I went to Los Angeles, and was thrilled to have a cameo in the pilot.

I made many friends among the writers, producers, cast, and crew; got into the Writers Guild of America based on my work on the series; made a lot of money; and had a blast.

I’ll never forget this past year, and I thank everyone involved — but especially Jessika Borsiczky, Brannon Braga, David S. Goyer, and Vince Gerardis — for making it possible. It was a wonderful ride.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

• Vancouver, British Columbia
  Vancouver Public Library
  Central Branch
  Alma VanDusen Room on the lower level
  350 West Georgia Street
  In conjunction with (but not at) White Dwarf Books
  Wednesday, May 5, 2010, at 7:30 p.m.
• Calgary, Alberta
  Hillhurst Sunnyside Community Centre
  Hearth Room, 1320 – 5 Ave NW
  (not at Pages on Kensington, although they will be on hand to sell books)
  Friday, May 7, 2010, at 7:30 p.m.
• Edmonton, Alberta
  Audreys Books
  10702 Jasper Avenue NW
  Saturday, May 8, 2010, 2:00 p.m.
  (not 3:00 p.m. as previously advertised)
  Audreys events page
• Ottawa, Ontario
  Clock Tower Brew Pub
  575 Bank Street
  In conjunction with (but not at) Perfect Books
  Monday, May 10, 2010, 7:30 p.m.
  Perfect Books event page
• Halifax, Nova Scotia
  Spring Garden Road Memorial Public Library
  5381 Spring Garden Road
  Sponsored by the Canada Council for the Arts
  Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
  Spring Garden branch information
• Waterloo, Ontario
  Words Worth Books
  100 King Street South
  Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
  Words Worth event page
• Winnipeg, Manitoba
  McNally Robinson
  1120 Grant Avenue
  Saturday, May 22, 2010, at 2:00 p.m.
  (and at Keycon the rest of that weekend)
  McNally event page
• Prince George, British Columbia
  Books & Company
  1685 3rd Avenue
  Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
  Books & Company event page
• Montreal, Quebec
  Indigo Books and Music
  Place Montreal Trust
  1500 Ave McGill College
  Tuesday, June 8, 2010, at 7:00 p.m.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

This morning I submitted the manuscript for Wonder, the third volume of my WWW trilogy, and my 20th novel, to my three English-language editors:

• Ginjer Buchanan at Ace Science Fiction in New York
• Adrienne Kerr at Penguin Group (Canada) in Toronto
• Simon Spanton at Orion/Gollancz in London

I spent six years working on this trilogy.  I’m pleased with how it came out.  Wonder will be published in April 2011.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

My book tour event in Calgary, Alberta, for Watch, has a new, bigger venue: Friday, May 7, 7:30 p.m., Hillhurst Sunnyside Community Centre, Hearth Room, 1320 – 5 Ave NW. The time and date are the same as before, but the place is different. The event is not at Pages at Kensington bookstore, but the good people from Pages will be on hand to sell books.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Today is the day everyone saw a glimpse of during their flashforwards in FlashForward , the ABC TV series based on my novel of the same name. It also happens to be my 50th birthday. In honour of both, I provide the English text of an interview I just did for a Hungarian publication. Enjoy!

1. Playing with memories and the future is recurring theme in SF, still the idea of Flashforward is unique. How was it born?

At my 20th anniversary high-school reunion, everyone was saying, “If I’d only known back then what I know now, my life would be better.” They all thought they would have avoided bad marriages, or bad careers, or bad investments. I wondered if foreknowledge of the future really would be a good thing, and so contrived a thought experiment to answer that question in the form of a novel.

2. There are two futures in the book, the one in 2009 (which was 10 years from your present when you wrote the novel) and the one in 2030. Which one was the harder to create and why?

It’s always harder to predict further ahead, especially since the rate of technological progress is exponential, not linear: there will be much more than three times as much progress thirty years in the future as there will be ten years in the future. Still, it was tricky to pick which things would be around in ten years, and which would take longer — most people just think about the future, period, not that the future has an infinite number of gradations to it.

3. The seemingly unimportant inventions in the far future like flying cars and emagazines are very interesting. Were you thinking a lot about them or they just came while writing the book?

I spend a lot of time studying technology and looking at what scientists and engineers are contemplating; I certainly didn’t just make things up, but rather was looking for reasonable projections. It’s very hard to do right!

4. Flashforward contains a lot of scientific elements still the book is very amusing. Was it hard to write it this way?

Actually, no. I love talking about science in my day-to-day life, and I think it’s at least as interesting a topic as politics or sports, so it’s easy for me to make it entertaining on the printed page.

5. Have you ever been in CERN? Was it hard to depict it in the novel?

No, I haven’t. Back when I was writing FLASHFORWARD, in 1997 and 1998, my career as a novelist had only just begun to really take off, and I simply couldn’t afford the trip. But I did lots of research about CERN, and spoke to people who worked there. Many who have been to CERN have been surprised to learn that I’ve never been; they think I must have been there because I got the details right. Of course, if I knew that ultimately FLASHFORWARD was going to make me more money than any other book I’d ever written — thanks to the TV series — I would have sprung for that trip back in 1997. Sometimes it sucks not being able to see the future!

6. Do you do a lot of research for your writings?

Tons! It’s my favourite part. I spend three or four months doing nothing but research for each book before I write the first word. I love learning new things, and if I could just do research all day long, I’d be a happy guy.

7. Besides technical and scientific elements, human relationships are strongly present in the novel. Do you think it’s important for an SF book to depict both of these themes?

Absolutely! Although some very-technical science fiction is intellectually intriguing just for that, good stories are about people, and I really try hard to make mine interesting, nuanced, and believable.

8. When did you get to know that there’s going to be a TV series based on your book and what were thinking and feeling back then?

It was a two-stage process: first, ABC decided to make a pilot episode — which was great, but it was also all I thought we’d ever get; many pilots are made, but only a few get picked up to become ongoing series. I was thrilled because it represented a lot of money just to have the pilot made, but somewhat subdued, because most failed pilots are never broadcast; there was still a very good chance no one would ever see it outside of the boardrooms at ABC. But when the series was picked up — initially for 13 episodes, later expanded to 22 — I was ecstatic: I knew many millions of people worldwide were going to be exposed to my work for the first time; it was a wonderful feeling, and I got the word when my wife and I happened to be over at the house of some friends, so we immediately had a celebration.

9. How do you like the series? What is good and what is not so good in it in your opinion?

I very much like the series; it looks fabulous, the cast is great, and the storylines are gripping — what’s not to like?

10. Do you think FlashForward gives a chance for other SF writers to get their writings adapted?

Honestly? No. For the most part, Hollywood doesn’t even see FLASHFORWARD as science fiction: it has no spaceships and no aliens, and ABC actually didn’t want us calling the series “science fiction.” We’re already into the next year of TV pilots in the States, and no other author has had a science-fiction series pilot made from his or her books this year; fantasy, yes, but not science fiction. FLASHFORWARD was a unique occurrence.

11. Are there any other of your works that are going to be adapted on TV or film?

Yes, indeed. Four of my other properties are currently in development: two theatrical motion pictures, a made-for-TV movie, and a television miniseries. Of course, anything can go wrong before the cameras start rolling, so I’m not holding my breath. But it’s very exciting!

12. You have won almost every SF award imaginable. Do you think it’s important for a writer to get this kind of honour?

Absolutely! As more and more people self-publish and as books move to electronic form, we’ll see a flood of material to choose from — and it will be very hard for readers to sort the wheat from the chaff. The notion that somehow online reviewing will do that isn’t likely to come true; for many major SF books now, Amazon.com has only two or three reviews — most books released to the marketplace in future will get very few reviews, if any. But being a Hugo Award winner or a Nebula Award winner has always been the sign of quality in the SF field. Authors who succeed in the 21st century will have to become brand names, and those credentials help enormously.

13. Which one of your books is your favourite and why?

It varies from year to year, but currently I’m most proud of CALCULATING GOD. I think I did the best job I’ve ever done of telling a philosophically rich story with believable characters; it’s hard to make people both think and cry, but readers tell me I managed it in that book.

14. The relation of science and religion is a recurring theme in your writings. Why is this so important to you?

Stephen Jay Gould said that science and religion were “nonoverlapping magisteria,” each with its own appropriate area of influence, but I think that’s a wrong — and even cowardly — thing to say. There is only one reality, and we should be able to examine the claims of anyone purporting to understand it with a critical eye, whether those claims come from someone wearing a lab coat or a cassock. Science fiction is all about the fundamental questions of who we are, where we came from, where we’re going, and what, if any, meaning there is to life. Neither science nor religion is going away — much to the chagrin of extremists in both camps — and science fiction is a natural place to discuss the validity of both.

15. Have you got favourite writers who influence your works?

Yes, indeed: Sir Arthur C. Clarke, first and foremost, for the sense of wonder, and for first showing me that science and religion could be rationally explored in fiction. Then Frederik Pohl and Larry Niven, the former for depth of characterization and the latter for cool science. I think you can see their influence in every one of my 20 novels to date, including, of course, FLASHFORWARD: the cosmic ending is Clarke-like; the angsty characters are Pohl-esque; and the cool physics is Nivenish — while at the same time the whole thing is, I hope, pure Rob Sawyer.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email

Hello, Robert J. Sawyer reader!

Welcome to my twice-a-year newsletter.  This time: new novel, FLASHFORWARD news, cross-Canada book tour, and more!

===

NEW BLOG ADDRESS!

I’ve switched my blog to WordPress, which necessitated a slight change to the address.  My blog can now be found at:

http://sfwriter.com/blog/

===

WWW: WAKE now out in paperback!

WWW: WATCH now out in hardcover!

Both out as audiobooks from Audible.com!

WAKE is a GLOBE AND MAIL Bestseller!

WATCH, the second volume of the WWW trilogy is now out!  WATCH picks up the story begun in WAKE.

“Sawyer shows his genius in combining cutting-edge scientific theories and technological developments with real human characters.” — THE GLOBE AND MAIL on WATCH

“Sawyer is a brilliant thinker pondering some of the most fundamental questions we face today; a complex and fascinating book.” — NATIONAL POST on WATCH

* More about WAKE:  http://sfwriter.com/exw1.htm

* More about WATCH:  http://sfwriter.com/exw2.htm

Penguin’s official website for the trilogy:

http://wakewatchwonder.com

===

HUGO and AURORA FINALIST!

WWW: WAKE is on the Hugo Award ballot!  Details:

http://sfwriter.com/blog/?p=2288

WAKE is also a finalist for Canada’s Aurora Awards; any Canadian may vote here (there’s a $5 voting fee):

http://prix-aurora-awards.ca/English/home.htm

===

BOOK TOUR!

Coast-to-coast Canadian book tour events for WATCH:

• Vancouver:  Wednesday, May 5
• Prince George:  Tuesday, May 25
• Calgary:  Friday, May 7
• Edmonton:  Saturday, May 8
• Winnipeg:  Saturday, May 22
• Waterloo:  Wednesday, May 19
• Sudbury:  August 2010 (date TBD)
• Ottawa:  Monday, May 10
• Montreal:  Tuesday, June 8
• Halifax:  Tuesday, May 11

Details:

http://sfwriter.com/lnappear.htm

===

NEW CANADIAN EDITIONS!

Gorgeous new Canadian editions of the following books are now out:

* THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT

Nebula Award winner!

http://sfwriter.com/exte.htm

* ILLEGAL ALIEN

Seiun Award winner!

http://sfwriter.com/exia.htm

* STARPLEX

Aurora Award winner!

http://sfwriter.com/exsx.htm

Buy autographed copies directly from the author:

http://sfwriter.com/autograp.htm

STARPLEX and THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT are also available as audiobooks from Audible.com.

===

FLASHFORWARD SCRIPT!

I wrote the script for “Course Correction,” the 19th episode of FLASHFORWARD, the ABC TV series based on my novel of the same name.  It airs in North America Thursday, May 6, 2010, at 8:00 p.m. (7:00 p.m.) Central.

* FLASHFORWARD

http://sfwriter.com/exff.htm

===

RJS on the Web:

Website:  http://sfwriter.com

Blog:  http://sfwriter.com/blog/

Newsgroup:  http://tinyurl.com/rjs-group

Twitter:  RobertJSawyer

Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/robertjsawyer

The Toronto Sun runs a “This Week in Canadian History” each Monday, and today’s edition has two shout outs to science fiction.

April 26, 1912: Novelist A.E. van Vogt was born on a farm in a Mennonite community in Manitoba. Rather than writing boring coming-of-age-on-a-farm stories, van Vogt opted to pen sci-fi classics about space aliens and super humans. He was one of the best-selling sci-fi writers of the 20th century.

April 29, 1960: Speaking of Canadians who got famous by writing about space aliens, best-selling sci-fi author Robert J. Sawyer was born this day in Ottawa. The hit ABC show FlashForward is based on one of his novels.

Cool! Many thanks to World Fantasy Award nominee Terence M. Green for bringing this to my attention.

Robert J. Sawyer online:
Website • Facebook • Twitter • Newsgroup • Email